Actuarial valuation · IAS 19

Valuing end-of-service obligations for a 3,400-employee group, including an intra-group transfer

A group with five Saudi entities had accrued end-of-service benefits at the amount payable, never obtained an actuarial valuation, and had transferred 600 employees between subsidiaries during the year. The auditors required an IAS 19 valuation and a position on the transfer before they would sign.

Industrial and services group, Saudi ArabiaIAS 19 EOSB Actuarial Valuation

SAR 11.3mdifference between the accrued liability and the IAS 19 obligation across the group

5entities valued on a consistent basis with one assumptions memorandum

600employees transferred, accounted for as a settlement with the gain recognised in profit or loss

0audit adjustments on employee benefits after the valuation

Context

The client

The group employs Saudi and expatriate staff in manufacturing, logistics and facilities services. Each subsidiary had its own HR system and its own interpretation of the gratuity formula, and the group reports to a listed parent with a tight consolidation timetable.

The challenge

Where the client started

The accrued liability had been calculated by each entity's HR department at the amount that would be paid if every employee left at the reporting date. That ignores future salary growth, the probability of leaving before vesting and discounting, so the group did not know whether it was over- or under-provided, only that the auditors would not accept the number.

During the year 600 employees had moved from one subsidiary to another under a restructuring, with their service continuity preserved. Neither entity had considered the IAS 19 consequences: the transferring entity had simply reversed its accrual and the receiving entity had recognised a new one, leaving an unexplained difference in the consolidation.

Scope

What we were engaged to do

Census data collection and validation across five HR systems
Group assumptions memorandum: discount rate from the Saudi government sukuk curve, salary growth, attrition by nationality and service band, mortality and retirement age
Projected unit credit valuation for each entity and the consolidated group
Accounting position on the intra-group transfer under IAS 19 paragraphs 109 to 112
IAS 19 disclosure note, journal entries and the reconciliation from opening to closing obligation
Auditor walkthrough and responses to the group's reporting accountants

What we did

Our approach

Validated the data firstFive census extracts were reconciled to payroll and to the general ledger accruals. Duplicate records across entities, arising from the transfer, were identified and resolved before any calculation.

Set assumptions once for the groupA single memorandum derived the discount rate from the Saudi government sukuk curve at the group's obligation duration, and set salary growth, attrition by nationality and service band, mortality and retirement age with sources. Each subsidiary adopted it, ending five different practices.

Valued and reconciledEach entity was valued using the projected unit credit method with sensitivities to the discount rate, salary growth and attrition, and the movement from the prior-year accrual was explained line by line.

Resolved the transferThe transfer was treated as a settlement in the transferring entity and a plan assumption in the receiving entity, with the settlement gain measured as the difference between the obligation settled and the amount transferred, recognised in profit or loss, and eliminated on consolidation. The position paper was accepted by the auditors without modification.

The outcome

What changed

The group recognised an additional SAR 11.3 million of obligation across the five entities, with the remeasurement on first adoption of the actuarial basis presented in other comprehensive income and the transfer effect presented in profit or loss with disclosure. The consolidation difference disappeared.

The auditors signed without adjustment, the listed parent's reporting pack was submitted on time, and the group now runs an annual valuation with interim roll-forwards using our data request template.

The valuation was the easy part. The value was in getting five entities onto one set of assumptions and giving the auditors a position on the transfer before they asked for it.

Lessons

What we would tell another client

An accrual at the amount payable today is not an IAS 19 obligation, and auditors have stopped accepting it for entities of any size.
Transfers of employees between group entities are settlements, and they need a position paper before the year-end, not after.
One assumptions memorandum for the group prevents five arguments with the auditors.

Engagement details are anonymised and figures are rounded. Client identity is available on request, subject to confidentiality.

More case studies